Wholehog 4

As long as it include a full on fixture builder, USB, motorized faders and network backup / tracking =)

[quote=stephenwyker]As long as it include a full on fixture builder, USB, motorized faders and network backup / tracking =)

Well tracking back-up is possible. But only via MSC. I agree with your suggestions. Maybe some playback buttons like the MA. I do like that functionality.

I was referring to complete network backup, like on MA, whereas the server process is not ran on a single console; thus if a crash occurs in say programming, everything is saved across the distributed network.

[quote=stephenwyker]I was referring to complete network backup, like on MA, whereas the server process is not ran on a single console; thus if a crash occurs in say programming, everything is saved across the distributed network.

Yea, OK. Makes sense

I do agree with executor buttons similar to MA as well .. Scenes work, but I like the physical button esp for things like ACLs, Strobes, some bumps ... Would also be great to attach efx attributes like size, offset, speed to a fader as well; same with gobo rotate, color rotate, other fixture attributes as well like on an AVO

My opinion would be no....with the exception of motorized faders on the main console, anything else can pretty much be done with software and/or wings.

While I have said that I don't care for motorized faders, they could do a wing with one.

I would like to see a wing the size of a small laptop keyboard of executor buttons. Nice and simple and I can place it right between my HIII and my Expansion Wing.

Pretty much anything else should be able to be accomplished with software and existing hardware.

No...until they have finished with H3. There's bugs still in the basic functionality (timing, tracking) and some H2 features are missing. Also the list of requests is endless :) (when we get the macros, tracksheet, FX engine rework etc etc.)

[quote=srautane]No...until they have finished with H3. There's bugs still in the basic functionality (timing, tracking) and some H2 features are missing. Also the list of requests is endless :) (when we get the macros, tracksheet, FX engine rework etc etc.)

Agreed. I didnt mean straight away. I meant In the future. My bad.

I have nothing against H4, but like I said there's so much potential in H3. I think the H4 relevant when the hardware needs major improvements.

A bit off topic, but it's sometimes good to read this old thread in LN
lightnetwork.com/index.php?destin=.%2Fmessage.php%3Fmsg%3D138.1

hi,a hog 4 maybe to have a art net port on board and a flashmemory maybe.its to little for a hog 4 in the moment.

greeds

No..only cause I just bought a Hog 3.

Happy New Year everyone!!!!

There is no reason to have H4 now as there is a lot of software developments to do and many hardware modifications can be done in the H3.

Sure! Go Hog 4!

I think an introduction at the October 2025 LDI should be about right.

Sure.....eventually.....

Right now the focus in development should be on software though....not hardware. Got all the new hardware I need right now with DP-8000!:headbang:

Brad often says "We have plans of adding it in the near future" so they surly have plan of adding other functions in far future, so we have time for H4 :D